Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!aplcen!jhunix!ins_ampm From: ins_ampm@jhunix.UUCP (Michael P McKenna) Newsgroups: net.puzzle Subject: Re: Circles and chords (Hint from author) Message-ID: <2083@jhunix.UUCP> Date: Tue, 4-Mar-86 13:25:21 EST Article-I.D.: jhunix.2083 Posted: Tue Mar 4 13:25:21 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 7-Mar-86 05:47:31 EST References: <965@h-sc1.UUCP> Reply-To: ins_ampm@jhunix.ARPA (Michael P McKenna) Distribution: net Organization: Johns Hopkins Univ. Computing Ctr. Lines: 73 In article <965@h-sc1.UUCP> shields@h-sc1.UUCP writes: > > Here is a hint to help you on your way to finding solutions to >the previously posed puzzle: any chord of a circle can be represented by >its midpoint. Therefore this helps in two ways: it is possible to generate >random chords by generating random points, and a simple check for >intersection with the inner circle is to check if the midpoint of the chord >is in the inner circle. This should help considerably, and make evident >yet another solution to the puzzle. However, we found more solutions based >on this property also, see if you can find them. > > Happy puzzling, > > - Tom Shields > Harvard University I don't seem to have received the puzzle, but if it is what I think it is you want to be careful about random generation. This is discussed in one of Martin Gardner's columns, reprinted in _The 2nd Scientific American Mathematical Puzzles & Diversions_ The problem (which sounds like it might be your puzzle), is to determine the probability that a random chord drawn in a circle is longer than the side of an equilateral triangle inscribed in the circle. It is easy to show that this probability depends on the method of generating the random chord. The first suggested method is to pick a point A on the circle. This is one endpoint of the chord. The other endpoint is can range uniformly over the rest of the circle. By symmetry it doesn't matter where A is for computing the probability, so assume that A is at the one of the vertices of the triangle (or just inscribe the triangle so that one of its vertices is at A if this makes you feel uncomfortable). Anyway clearly the chord is longer than the side of the triangle, if and only if it cuts across the triangle. The angle at the vertex is 60 degrees out of a possible 180 degrees so the probability is 1/3. 2nd method: Any chord must be perpendicular to one of the diameters. Pick a diameter, position the triangle so that a vertex is at one of the endpoints. Now the set of chords ranges over the length of the diameter. The diameter intersects the triangle at the midpoint of one side, label this point A. Label the analagous point on the opposite side of the diameter B. Clearly only the chords between A and B are longer than the triangle's side. This length is equal to 1/2 the diameter. Therefore the probability is 1/2 3rd method: The one suggested above. Let the midpoint of the chord range uniformly over the area of the circle. It is easy to show that chords longer that the triangle side must have their midpoints inside a circle with same center, and 1/2 the radius of the original circle. This inner circle therefore has area 1/4 the original circle, therfore the probability of the midpoint being inside it is 1/4. So depending upon which method we choose to generate random chords we get an answer of 1/2, 1/3, or 1/4. When stating that something is to be chosen at random, it is important to state HOW it is to be chosen at random. Interestingly the articly states that humans do not seem to use any of the above methods when asked to draw a random chord. The probability of a subject drawing a chord longer than the side of the triangle is much better than 1/2. Dwight S. Wilson Disclaimer: Why should I disclaim these views? They're mathematically correct. "WARNING: The above contents contain letters and words. USE WITH CAUTION. Improper use may lead to ideas and thoughts. If you find yourself forming opinions, contact your physician at once."