Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site starfire.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!ncs-med!starfire!brust
From: brust@starfire.UUCP (Steven K. Zoltan Brust)
Newsgroups: net.rec.bridge
Subject: Re: interesting bidding problem
Message-ID: <195@starfire.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 27-Feb-86 04:27:01 EST
Article-I.D.: starfire.195
Posted: Thu Feb 27 04:27:01 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Mar-86 04:18:33 EST
References: <1826@jhunix.UUCP> <8658@watarts.UUCP>
Organization: Starfire Consulting Services, Mpls MN
Lines: 42

>
>			North
>
>		  S: 6
>		  H: AK762
>		  D: 9632
>		  C: J52
>
>			South
>	
>		  S: AKT73
>		  H: Q43
>		  D: AKQT7
>		  C:
>

This is actually from friend Martin Schafer, not me:


 South	West	North	East
 1c[1]	Pass	1h[2]	Pass
 1s	pass	1nt	pass
 2d	pass	3d	pass
 3s[3]	pass	4h[4]	pass
 4s[5]	pass	5h[6]	pass
 7d[7]	pass	pass	pass

1	17+ HCP
2	Positive response, natural
3	Agreeing on suit, showing ace of spades
4	Showing ace of hearts
5	Showing king of spades
6	Showing king of hearts
7	With the heart suit running and partner probably having
	four diamonds, it is very unlikely that we have any spade
	losers and most possible hands should have a play for seven.

	The tricky part is: partnership agreement must be that the
	2d 3d sequence, after the strong club with a positive response,
	DOES delclare suit.  This is not too unreasonable.

	-- Martin Schafer