Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!mangoe
From: mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate)
Newsgroups: net.religion.christian,net.religion.jewish
Subject: Re: Genesis 6:1-4, A query regarding interpretation.
Message-ID: <3396@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 27-Feb-86 22:31:57 EST
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.3396
Posted: Thu Feb 27 22:31:57 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 2-Mar-86 08:37:47 EST
References: <686@well.UUCP>
Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD
Lines: 15
Xref: lsuc net.religion.christian:363 net.religion.jewish:1872

[With regard to Gen. chap. 6, and the "sons of God' and the "daughters of
man":]
>>	I would be interested in hearing (via mail or a reply posting to
>>this net) about any information explaining how this passage is interpreted
>>by biblical scholars or anyone else for that matter. Any info could help
>>settle a friendly argument I had with a friend regarding this rather
>>unclear and strange passage from Genesis.

Well, this will be no help at all, but I couldn't help noticing how this
passage appears to support the "synthesis" of Creationism and Evolution
found in _Science Made Stupid_.

    :-)    of course

C. Wingate