Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site convex
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!locke
From: locke@convex.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.rumor
Subject: Re: Star Trek episodes filmed but not a
Message-ID: <42000003@convex>
Date: Wed, 19-Feb-86 07:58:00 EST
Article-I.D.: convex.42000003
Posted: Wed Feb 19 07:58:00 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 21-Feb-86 05:53:51 EST
References: <347@quest.UUCP>
Lines: 8
Nf-ID: #R:quest.UUCP:347:convex:42000003:000:404
Nf-From: convex.UUCP!locke    Feb 19 06:58:00 1986


I don't believe it either.  Maybe her description's off. (actually
there is not much description there). Maybe she didn't actually
see the original runs of Startrek.  Anyway, the reason I am writing
is to recommend a book called "The Making of Startrek" by some
guy named Gene Roddenberry (please excuse the spelling). This book
tells "it all".  A must for trekkies (assuming you can still find
a copy).