Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.PCS 1/10/84; site mtgzz.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!pesnta!pyramid!decwrl!decvax!bellcore!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtgzz!leeper From: leeper@mtgzz.UUCP (m.r.leeper) Newsgroups: net.movies,net.sf-lovers Subject: BRAZIL Message-ID: <1705@mtgzz.UUCP> Date: Wed, 5-Mar-86 11:14:43 EST Article-I.D.: mtgzz.1705 Posted: Wed Mar 5 11:14:43 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 7-Mar-86 00:30:52 EST Organization: AT&T Information Systems Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 63 Xref: lsuc net.movies:3494 net.sf-lovers:6189 BRAZIL A film review by Mark R. Leeper Capsule review: This is the best science fiction film of 1985. But catch this story of an Orwellian future quickly --it won't be around for long. 1984 never came. At least, not the way that George Orwell pictured it in 1984. The book was his prediction from the viewing point of 1948 of what the next 36 years could bring. It is a moot point how accurate his prediction was, but the book is still a valuable yardstick for measuring our current world. It has been a valuable yardstick for years. BRAZIL is a new film. It does not have the track record of having been useful for years. However, it also seems to be a prediction from the viewpoint of 1948 of how the world could have turned out and today it is no less valuable than 1984 as a yardstick for measuring today's society. In the world of BRAZIL technology has stagnated. The lords of creation are a megalithic bureaucracy and, apparently, the people who make heating ducts. All the technology in the world is refinements of inventions that were around at the end of World War II. (One exception, I think, is the Fresnel lens, but for society to have changed so much and for only one invention to come along is a rather telling indictment of this political system.) This is a paper-bound society in which the path to getting the smallest thing done has the form in a triangle. The greatest public enemy is a man who does repairs without red tape. In this world one minor official, one Sam Lowry, has abstract dreams of escaping the dingy crush of government world and flying free with his ideal woman. These fantasies have sapped Lowry's will to get ahead at the dismal Ministry of Information. When he finds that the woman he has been dreaming of really exists, he starts fighting the mournful inertia of the society to try to find her. Terry Gilliam seems to have for some time wanted to do in live action the sort of things he did in animation for MONTY PYTHON. He nearly succeeded in TIME BANDITS, but the script of that film was extremely uneven. This time he co-authored the script with Tom Stoppard, considered to be one of the greatest living playwrights. And the choice of Stoppard paid off. For the first time in his career, Gilliam was not just making people laugh, he was telling a story of substance. Instead of just joking about the meaning of life, Gilliam is now actually saying something about it. Jonathan Pryce, who oozed malevolence in SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES, carries the film as San Lowry. Also on hand are familiar faces like Robert De Niro, Ian Holm, Katherine Helmond, and Michael Palin. This film gets a +2 for pleasure, but on the -4 to +4 scale it can get nothing less than a +3 for artistic achievement. This was the best science fiction film of 1985. A recent FILM COMMENT takes Universal to task for releasing STICK, JAMES JOYCE'S WOMEN, CREATOR, MORONS FROM OUTER SPACE, DREAM CHILD, WILD GEESE II, and HOLOCAUST COVENANT in 1985, while deciding BRAZIL was unreleasable. Universal is absolutely right. A film this good probably will not attract enough of the teenage audience to make it profitable. It will play at your local art theater a week and then disappear, like SMILE or STUNT MAN. And just like these films, people will be rediscovering BRAZIL for years to come. Mark R. Leeper ...ihnp4!mtgzz!leeper