Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site mhuxt.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxt!js2j
From: js2j@mhuxt.UUCP (sonntag)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.singles
Subject: Re: Beach harassment
Message-ID: <1400@mhuxt.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 17-Feb-86 10:19:26 EST
Article-I.D.: mhuxt.1400
Posted: Mon Feb 17 10:19:26 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 18-Feb-86 03:59:05 EST
References: <8342@ucla-cs.ARPA> <2581@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 30
Xref: watmath net.women:9058 net.singles:10311

> In article <1395@mhuxt.UUCP> js2j@mhuxt.UUCP (sonntag) writes:
>>> >Imagine you are 5'2" tall and weigh 100 lbs.  You are an attractive man and
>>> >dress accordingly.  While sunning on the beach, in your bikini swim suit, a
> >> 
> >> Not quite.  Let's suppose, in addition, that your trunks can be undone
> >> at the back, and you have done so in order to get a nice even tan.
> >> Now, maybe, this analogy is a little fairer.
> >> David Canzi
> >
> >      Sorry to be the one to have to tell you this, Dave, but you've got
> >rather unusual taste in bawdy parts.  Most guys aren't turned on a whole
> >lot by backs.
> 
> Speak for yourself, Jeff, lots of us find the female back to be quite
> attractive.
> Snoopy

     I just want to make two points:
	1.) I think that a discussion of which female body parts are the
	    most attractive is not appropriate to net.women; maybe this
	    discussion should be routed to net.high-school.locker-room.
	2.) I still think that anyone who finds backs *as exciting as gays
	    must find male buttocks* is rather unusual.  I suppose I could
	    be wrong, since David and Snoopy have announced themselves as
	    counterexamples.  

   Watch your backs, ladies!
-- 
Jeff Sonntag
ihnp4!mhuxt!js2j