Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sfsup.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!bellcore!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!mhuxm!sftig!sfsup!mjs From: mjs@sfsup.UUCP (M.J.Shannon) Newsgroups: net.women,net.singles Subject: Re: career vs. relationships Message-ID: <147@sfsup.UUCP> Date: Mon, 24-Feb-86 23:51:00 EST Article-I.D.: sfsup.147 Posted: Mon Feb 24 23:51:00 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 26-Feb-86 06:44:18 EST References: <251@batcomputer.TN.CORNELL.EDU> <138@sfsup.UUCP> <1723@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: AT&T Information Systems, Summit N.J. Lines: 45 Xref: linus net.women:8910 net.singles:9430 >In article <138@sfsup.UUCP> mjs@sfsup.UUCP (M.J.Shannon) writes: >>[...] I, for one, intend to continue to read what she [Cheryl] has to >>say, file it away as what *one* woman can interpret the state of the world >>as, and hope that someone helps her see how things really are. >The previous paragraph (in it's entirety) states: >>There are none so blind as those who will not see. >I'd say that's about right. She may be obnoxious, Marty, but she >may also be right. Then again, she may not. But knowing beforehand >that you're going to file *everything* she says away as "one woman's >misguided opinion" sounds like a refusal to see (or at least listen) >if I ever heard one. >-- >--JB ((Just) Beth Christy, U. of Chicago, ..!ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!beth) > Sylvia says `A real lady never asks: "Was *what* good for me?". > ("I'm sorry - I wasn't paying attention.")' Whoa! I will admit that my phrasing was less than what I'd intended (blush), but don't call me blind (fumble-fingered, perhaps). Permit me to elaborate (something I was unable to do at the time). First, Cheryl presents the most one-sided views of her chosen topics I've ever encountered. Since these are the only insights we (the net) are shown of Cheryl (can anyone believe she's *never* had a caring relationship with a man (at least before her apparent current state of mind set in)?), I cannot believe she is *right*. Further, she *is* obnoxious, and that too detracts credence from what she says. The intent of my statement was that I will read her postings and award them the credibility they deserve on the basis of content. Thus far, they have not merited an overwhelming amount of credibility (as is true of anyone's flames). And, a parting shot (to Beth). I generally find humor in people's cute quotes, but after seeing it many times in the last week or so, yours has reached in and struck a raw nerve. To wit, I offer the following: Marty says, `A real man never has to ask a real lady, "Was it good for you?"' -- Marty Shannon UUCP: ihnp4!attunix!mjs Phone: +1 (201) 522 6063 Disclaimer: I speak for no one. "If I never loved, I never would have cried." -- Simon & Garfunkel