Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!ut-sally!pyramid!hplabs!felix!daver From: daver@felix.UUCP (Dave Richards) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Greener Pastures and Topics,Bitte! Message-ID: <901@felix.UUCP> Date: Mon, 24-Feb-86 16:23:33 EST Article-I.D.: felix.901 Posted: Mon Feb 24 16:23:33 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 26-Feb-86 07:44:51 EST References: <11952@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <3172@sdcc3.UUCP> Reply-To: daver@felix.UUCP (Dave Richards) Organization: FileNet Corp., Costa Mesa, CA Lines: 30 Keywords: New topics. In article <3172@sdcc3.UUCP> co20wta@sdcc3.UUCP (Bruce Jones) writes: >I don't think it has anything to do with one's expectations. Rather >the divorce rate grows out of a rapidly changing social scene and >the individual's definition of her/his place in it. As the >definition changes for each of the partners they usually grow apart. >Add to this a lack of social and economic pressure pushing ideas >like staying together for the kid's sake and you have a high divorce >rate. > >Bruce Jones I think it's interesting that the law (in California) requires a trial one-year separation before a divorce is granted (I think), but what requirement is there for an engagement before marriage? I have not heard of any, but I've known of several people who have gotten married having known each other less than a year. (while they're still in their teens yet!) I'm a strong believer in very long engagements, but even so, I have yet to seriously consider marriage. Why? Because I can't imagine making the promise to love someone the rest of my life. Isn't it a lot to ask to expect two people not to change over a 60 year span? As far as likes, dislikes, personality, etc.? I note with amusement some of the newer ceremonies have replaced the phrase, "'till death do you part." The funniest one I've heard was, "'till the relationship shall end." What kind of commitment is that?! (rhetorical question) Oh well, at least it's honest. Whimsically, Dave "the Monk" Richards