Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site randvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!randvax!jeanette
From: jeanette@randvax.UUCP (Jeanette Haritan)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.singles
Subject: Re: Smarter? (was Re: Professional women remaining perpetually single)
Message-ID: <81@randvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 3-Mar-86 16:13:28 EST
Article-I.D.: randvax.81
Posted: Mon Mar  3 16:13:28 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Mar-86 03:30:38 EST
References: <1395@decwrl.DEC.COM> <3300@sun.uucp> <1427@ames.UUCP>
Reply-To: jeanette@rand-unix.UUCP (Jeanette Haritan)
Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica
Lines: 21
Xref: watmath net.women:9530 net.singles:10677

In article <1427@ames.UUCP> barry@ames.UUCP (Kenn Barry) writes:
>From Ed Falk (sun!falk):
>>2) Successful,
>>career-oriented women are more intelligent than non-carreer-oriented
>>women and can perceive more options in life and are less likely to
>>swallow the indoctrination they grew up with.
>
>	I'm not going to flame this excerpt because I've pulled it so
>much out of context that I may be distorting the writer's intent, but
>I *would* like a clarification. Do you want to let the bit about successful
>and career-oriented women being more intelligent than other women stand,
>as stated?
>

I'm sure you realize 'more intelligent' is not true.  I'm sure you meant
smarter in what they do for a living, i.e. bookwise.

The first statement, in my opinion, is simply not fair.


jlh