Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site convex Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!ahearn From: ahearn@convex.UUCP Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: those damned men Message-ID: <42200027@convex> Date: Tue, 4-Mar-86 16:56:00 EST Article-I.D.: convex.42200027 Posted: Tue Mar 4 16:56:00 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 7-Mar-86 04:15:05 EST Lines: 35 Nf-ID: #N:convex:42200027:000:1533 Nf-From: convex.UUCP!ahearn Mar 4 15:56:00 1986 I agree with many of the recent comments regarding mens's relative lack of ability to realate well with women in terms of touch and emotional sensitivity. My experience, at least, has been that while I talk a good line about emotional sensitivity, in practice I'm usually pretty slow to pick up emotional signals. I've also found that while I'm comfortable relating sexually to the women I've dated, I'm pretty awkward in the art of everyday touch. It seems to me that the real questions, at least to men, are: 1. How do you go about developing these parts of your personality? How do you teach a city boy to find his way through the woods? What do you do with a city boy if half of the world's population expects him to _know_ how to find his way through the woods? 2. If women recognize these types of problems so consistently, why are they often unwilling to give the men they're involved with the benefit of the doubt? (My last relationship ended for precisely the reasons we're talking about here and, believe me, I could have used some more feedback.) 3. If women have the right to expect men to learn and respect the subtleties of their natures, don't men have the right to expect the same type of understanding and willingness to learn? 4. What does a man learn to look for, if he's interested in catching troubles in this area early on? I'd be real interested in hearing what others have to say. Good topic. Joe Ahearn Convex Computers {allegra, ihnp4, uiucds, ctvax}!convex!ahearn