Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site tolerant.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!hplabs!oliveb!tolerant!kathy
From: kathy@tolerant.UUCP (Kathy Kister)
Newsgroups: net.singles,net.women
Subject: Re: Re: Why male dominance?
Message-ID: <293@tolerant.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 4-Mar-86 17:22:32 EST
Article-I.D.: tolerant.293
Posted: Tue Mar  4 17:22:32 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Mar-86 07:42:45 EST
References: <1270@decwrl.DEC.COM> <134@rtech.UUCP> <4570@mhuxd.UUCP>
Organization: Tolerant Systems, Inc.  San Jose, CA
Lines: 10
Xref: watmath net.singles:10720 net.women:9564

> > > 
> > > How do you account for the evolution of this male dominance?
> > > 				Seth Jackson
> > 
>It doesn't help matters that men believe that only male offspring can carry
on the family blood line and that the female don't count.  I would have thought
that everyone was past this, but I am constantly surprised by the number of
idiots (particularly, my fater-in-law) who believe this.  Generally, only
the male carries the family name and is the only way to insure "immorality".