Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site decwrl.DEC.COM
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-star!fisher
From: fisher@star.DEC (Burns Fisher ZKO1-1/D42 DTN 381-1466)
Newsgroups: net.space
Subject: Redesign booster seals?
Message-ID: <1472@decwrl.DEC.COM>
Date: Tue, 4-Mar-86 05:38:50 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.1472
Posted: Tue Mar  4 05:38:50 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 5-Mar-86 06:11:44 EST
Sender: daemon@decwrl.DEC.COM
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 20


Newsgroups: net.space
Path: decwrl!decvax!bellcore!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!stolaf!mmm!allen
Subject: Re: Soviet permanently manned station.
Posted: 26 Feb 86 14:39:54 GMT
Organization: 3M Company, St. Paul, Minn.
 
Kurt Allen writes: 
>	Aviation Week and Space tech. reported that NASA hopes to
>	keep the Hubble telescope as near to schedule as possible. That
>	announcement occured before the decision to redesign the SRB
>	seals was announce, which will probably take around a year.
> 

What decision to redesign the SRB seals?  Has anyone else heard of such
a decision?  Perhaps it is a good idea, but I certainly have not seen it!

Burns

...decwrl!rhea!star!fisher