Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!bellcore!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!ihuxi!moore1
From: moore1@ihuxi.UUCP (Moore)
Newsgroups: net.sport.football
Subject: Re: Recruiting Ratings Sought
Message-ID: <1323@ihuxi.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 21-Feb-86 09:51:53 EST
Article-I.D.: ihuxi.1323
Posted: Fri Feb 21 09:51:53 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 24-Feb-86 08:05:10 EST
References: <1972@cbsck.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 26

> 
>        Since the college football recruiting season has come to a
>        close, could anyone out there post a rating of how different
>        universities fared or some sort of top twenty crops.  I had
>        heard that Alabama and UCLA were doing quite well, along
>        with Notre Dame.  I know my team, the OSU Buckeyes, nabbed 3
>        of the top 10 linemen in the nation, but did not do as well
>        in the running back department (OSU stated that they had to
>        stop recruiting a number of players, especially running
>        backs, due to the stricter grade guidelines passed in
>        January by the NCAA).  I'm sure many of us on the net would
>        appreciate any available information.  Thanx in advance.
> 
> 						- Tim Robison

Tim, a week ago or so the USA Today (newspaper) had a headline article
regarding the top 100 college prospects and the colleges to which thay
had signed letters of intent.  The headline read something like, "PAC
10, etc., etc. gets cream of the crop".  I noticed the PAC 10 primarily
because I'm more interested in that conference and because the headline
lead off with them.  It also mentioned a couple of other conferences and
Notre Dame.  Basically, the PAC 10 had the best recruiting year of any
conference with UCLA, Washington and Southern Cal all doing very well.
I don't recall seeing anything about OSU, but do remember Notre Dame
as being right up there.  
I probably should have kept a copy, but needless to say I didn't.