Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gatech!win
From: win@gatech.CSNET (Win Strickland, Jr.)
Newsgroups: net.sport.hoops
Subject: Re: Predictabilty of the ACC?
Message-ID: <2922@gatech.CSNET>
Date: Wed, 5-Mar-86 10:24:59 EST
Article-I.D.: gatech.2922
Posted: Wed Mar  5 10:24:59 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Mar-86 04:36:23 EST
References: <1304@pucc-i> <1051@burl.UUCP> <1308@pucc-i>
Reply-To: win@gatech.UUCP (Win Strickland, Jr.)
Organization: School of ICS, Georgia Tech (Atlanta, Georgia)
Lines: 29

In article <1308@pucc-i> afb@pucc-i (Michael Lewis) writes:
(commenting on predictability of the ACC)
>    In the ACC, on the other hand, UNC, Georgia Tech, and Duke were supposed
>to be the top three teams.  They are the top three teams.  Georgia Tech has
>lost to noone else but Duke and UNC.  Duke has lost to UNC and (I think)
>Georgia Tech, or to UNC twice.
>
>    There are few upsets.  Up until this last week, noone but these three teams
>had beaten these three teams.  This is predictability.
                                        ----------------------

This is nonsense!  Georgia Tech lost its second game of the year against
Michigan.  UNC has lost to Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina State, and
finally Duke.  Most of these were "before this last week".

Perhaps you should check your facts, it would help your case to be
accurate.

As another poster has mentioned, having three of the best teams in the
country end up tops in their conference can hardly be used as a
knock again the ACC.

We'll all just have to wait for a couple of weekends to see what really
happens in the NCAA's.
-- 
Win Strickland Jr
School of Information & Computer Science, Georgia Tech, Atlanta GA 30332
CSNet:  win@GATech              ARPA:  win%GATech.CSNet@CSNet-Relay.ARPA
uucp : 	...!{akgua,decvax,hplabs,ihnp4,linus,seismo,ulysses}!gatech!win