Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 5/22/85; site osu-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!bellcore!ulysses!burl!clyde!cbosgd!osu-eddie!pritch
From: pritch@osu-eddie.UUCP (Norman Pritchett)
Newsgroups: net.startrek
Subject: Re: On Humans, Vulcans and Sarek
Message-ID: <1381@osu-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 25-Feb-86 14:28:50 EST
Article-I.D.: osu-eddi.1381
Posted: Tue Feb 25 14:28:50 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 27-Feb-86 03:37:58 EST
References: <1428@panda.UUCP> <745@mtx5d.UUCP>
Reply-To: pritch@osu-eddie.UUCP (Norman Pritchett)
Distribution: na
Organization: The Ohio State University
Lines: 25

In article <745@mtx5d.UUCP> elb@mtx5d.UUCP (Ellen Bart) writes:
>I've been following the arguements (uh, um, discussions) about
>Kirk's eulogy of Spock and am wondering if anyone was bothered
>by another Human v.s. Vulcan comment that bothered me.
>
>In "Search for Spock", Sarek says (and I misquote)
>
>	My logic is weak were my son is concerned.
>
>Now, to me, that is totally out of character for Sarek - especially
>since he doesn't have a human half to blame it on.  Besides, what's
>so illogical about trying the one chance Spock has for survival?
>
>Comments? Suggestions?
>
>Ellen Bart


Amanda was influenced by Vulcan culture.  Surely, Sarek couldn't have
tangled with Earth culture and come out unscathed :-)
-- 
Norm Pritchett, The Ohio State University
BITNET: TS1703 at OHSTVMA	Bellnet: (614) 422-0885
UUCP: cbosgd!osu-eddie!pritch	CSNET: pritch@ohio-state
ARPANET: NPRITCHETT%osu-20@ohio-state (or) pritch@ohio-state