Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Version 1.0 Netnews CMS/BITNET 5/19/85; site PSUVM.BITNET
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!burdvax!psuvax1!psuvm.bitnet!mw9
From: MW9@PSUVM.BITNET
Newsgroups: net.tv
Subject: Re: More Meta on Moonlighting
Message-ID: <4453MW9@PSUVM>
Date: Fri, 21-Feb-86 17:47:12 EST
Article-I.D.: PSUVM.4453MW9
Posted: Fri Feb 21 17:47:12 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 24-Feb-86 21:13:56 EST
References: 4423MW9@PSUVM 4427DVL@PSUVM 4433MW9@PSUVM 4446DVL@PSUVM
Lines: 24


     
In article <4446DVL@PSUVM>, DVL@PSUVM.BITNET says:
>MW9 at my school seems to have this requirement for subtlety in meta-comments.
>HOWEVER, I don't remember this being a requirement at all . . . if so, then
>great comments like "We have to.  There's another show in 20 minutes." (the
>spirit of the Christmas show comment, rather than the letter) would
>certainly have to be discounted.
     
No, that is a perfect example.  If you can't see the difference
between that comment and "Hi there, I'm a tv character" well
you are in need of psychiatric help.  :-)  It's not
sublety, but rather a sense of 'slipping in' the comment
rather than throwing it in my face.
     
-------
     
Michael S. Weiss
The Pennsylvania State University
MW9@PSUVM.BITNET
     
<* The opinions expressed by me do not reflect those held  *>
<* by my school nor those of my employer.  (If I had one.) *>