Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!mcvax!unido!ecrcvax!snoopy
From: snoopy@ecrcvax.UUCP (Sebastian Schmitz)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: ULTRIX 1.1 Disc Problems solved - Summary
Message-ID: <208@ecrcvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 24-Feb-86 08:46:37 EST
Article-I.D.: ecrcvax.208
Posted: Mon Feb 24 08:46:37 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 1-Mar-86 04:17:30 EST
Organization: ECRC, D-8000 Muenchen 81, W. Germany
Lines: 45

Expires:
References:
Sender:
Reply-To: snoopy@ecrcvax.UUCP (Sebastian Schmitz)
Followup-To:
Distribution:
Organization: European Computer-Industry Research Centre, Munchen, W. Germany
Keywords:


Apologies: I really wanted to include some of Chris Torek's
reply here, but our news software is broken a trifle.

In his reply to my note he writes (not verbatim):-

"Assuming one block per track reserved for the forwarding is
unwise: actually the number of blocks reserved can be found in
a device status packet."

This is true. However it did say one block in the controller
manual and I presume that the controller is the one who
generates this packet. I further assume that the controller
will not generate a value in the packet that does not
correspond to its DIP switch settings.
So I left things at "factory preset defaults".

In the light of this information, one has to take a look at the
controller or its status packet to correctly partition the
drives.

Sigh. Life does tend to require a few MB of recursion stack...

Love,
Seb

PS I do not know if one block is the generic default for the
QD32 Emulex controllers. Is it ?
-- 
There are three types of people:

- those who make things happen
- those who watch things happening
- and those who wonder what happened

...\!mcvax\!unido\!ecrcvax\!snoopy /* N.B. valid csh address */