Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 (USS@Tek, v1.0) based on 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site tekcbi.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!tekcbi!jimb
From: jimb@tekcbi.UUCP (Jim Boland)
Newsgroups: net.video
Subject: Re: stereo broadcasts
Message-ID: <514@tekcbi.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Feb-86 17:23:49 EST
Article-I.D.: tekcbi.514
Posted: Fri Feb 14 17:23:49 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 16-Feb-86 08:46:39 EST
References: <2757@sunybcs.UUCP> <476@tekcbi.UUCP> <533@nicmad.UUCP> <543@nicmad.UUCP>
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR
Lines: 20
Summary: one last comment

I mentioned to Mr. Video
> >First, don't read into an article what is not there.
> >Second, don't take things out of context.

To which he replied 
> At this point I have to say that you read something into his posting. He said
> "tuner", not what you said, "converter".  Tuners and converters and not the
> same.  They may end up giving the same results, but they are different.  
Yep.  I'll have to admit you were correct.  I mistakenly equated the two and
shouldn't have.  :-)    Sorry 'bout that.  Sure wasn't intentional, but 
I can see where your coming from and I'll agree.> 

>          ....     We each have
> our set of opinions (at least we are allowed to have opinions in this country)
> about this subject.  
And now that we've explained ourselves, I believe we are actually in agreement
on all points. (I've not repeated the part about "All bets are off", but I 
accept your reasoning.   Again, I shouldn't have said "All").

'nuff said.