Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site amiga.amiga.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!amiga!tomp From: tomp@amiga.UUCP (Tom Pohorsky) Newsgroups: net.wines Subject: Re: Cheap Bordeaux Message-ID: <758@amiga.amiga.UUCP> Date: Wed, 26-Feb-86 15:43:56 EST Article-I.D.: amiga.758 Posted: Wed Feb 26 15:43:56 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 28-Feb-86 22:14:37 EST References: <942@tesla.UUCP> Reply-To: tomp@stella.UUCP (Tom Pohorsky) Organization: Commodore-Amiga Inc., 983 University Ave #D, Los Gatos CA 95030 Lines: 40 In article <942@tesla.UUCP> c-hunt@tesla.UUCP (Charles Hunt) writes: >I agree with the previous writer that Robert Parker is NOT necessarily the >final word on good Bordeaux. I'll second that and more. He's not necessarily even a good word, and admits the his early, eager praise of the '83 red Burgundies (that helped push the prices too high, as he did for '82 Bordeaux) was off base, and that it's a mixed vintage at best. After trying about 50 of these, I find more alcohol and bunch rot than quality. I hear alot lately: "Geez, you should never pre- dict red Burg's from just barrel tasting." Hindsight is 50/50, or something like that. >But Michael Broadbent, writer Again, agreed. MB has his sh*t well together. His "Vintage Wine Book" has been the by far the best single wine reference book I've seen. >Good sources for "less" jaded opinions on French jugs: The Wine Spectator (if Disagreed. My impression is that it's self-serving wine industry hype. >My experiences--> Cheap but good: Ch. Marbuzet, Ch. La Tour de By, Ch. Greysac, >Ch. Fourcas Hosten, Ch. Smith Haut Lafitte, Ch. Carbonnieux, Ch. Baron Segur. throw in Potensac and La Gurgue. >$10 or so, but great: Ch. Prieure Lichine, Ch. LaLagune, Ch. du Tertre, Ch. >Bouscaut, Ch. Meyney, Ch. DeSales, Ch. Duhart Milon Rothschild, Ch. D'Angludet, >Ch. Cantemerle, Ch. Ormes de Pez, Ch. Cantenac Brown, Ch. Clos du Jacobins... ... and always a bargain at $20 or so: Leoville Las Cases, Pichon Lalande. >In order of preference, look for vintages: '78, '82, '83, '79, '81, all good. Especially among less expensive wines, I've enjoyed '81's as much as any of the others, most '79's a bit less. > >Cheers! =Charles E. Hunt= bottoms up, tomp.