Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site smeagol.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!oberon!smeagol!kwan From: kwan@smeagol.UUCP (Richard Kwan) Newsgroups: net.works Subject: Re: Help needed with configuring Suns Message-ID: <616@smeagol.UUCP> Date: Sun, 23-Feb-86 19:59:26 EST Article-I.D.: smeagol.616 Posted: Sun Feb 23 19:59:26 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 26-Feb-86 06:31:45 EST References: <241@brueer.brueer.UUCP> <176@hscfvax.UUCP> <3266@umcp-cs.UUCP> Organization: Spacecraft Data Systems, JPL, Pasadena, CA Lines: 30 In article <<3266@umcp-cs.UUCP> Mark Weiser writes: > In article <176@hscfvax.UUCP> pavlov@hscfvax.UUCP writes: > > > > Likewise, I would appreciate information/thoughts/etc on using a 3/160 or > > 3/180 "server" as a general-purpose time-sharing machine (eventually part ... > One problem with Suns as general time-sharing machines is relatively > slow terminal i/o. I believe I read a Sun spec which only promised > 4800 baud continuous output (9600 baud input). I can confirm that > when my Sun is handling 4800 baud the number of interrupts shoots > through the roof. Perhaps there are smarter boards on the way, > but where our 780 supports 80 terminals, I wouldn't want to be on > a sun-3 with 8, even though its cpu is theoretically faster. > > One the other hand, we routinely use Suns here with 1 or 2 terminals > in addition to the hi-res console. ... This sounds like use of the serial I/O ports on the CPU or SCSI board (using zs.o). Anyone using the Systech terminal MUX on a Sun-3/180? For that matter, how does the Systech board on a Sun-2 compare to a DZ (or other MUX board) on a 780? -- Rick Kwan JPL Spacecraft Data Systems sdcrdcf!smeagol!kwan (UUCP) ia-sun2!smeagol!kwan@csvax.caltech.EDU (ARPA) -------------------------------------------------------------------- "...jumpin' into hyperspace ain't like dustin' crops, boy." H. Solo --------------------------------------------------------------------