Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ulysses!ucbvax!almsa-1.arpa!control
From: control@ALMSA-1.ARPA (William Martin)
Newsgroups: mod.telecom
Subject: Correction Re: SW Bell and Equal Access
Message-ID: <8603200320.AA10693@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>
Date: Thu, 13-Mar-86 10:33:34 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8603200320.AA10693
Posted: Thu Mar 13 10:33:34 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 21-Mar-86 06:50:29 EST
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 21
Approved: telecom@xx.lcs.mit.edu

Hi!

Thanks to Carl Moore for asking me about this -- it caused me to look
at my paperwork and I caught an error in my previous submission about
SW Bell and Equal Access. I had said that the users' choices were to be
mailed to "an address in Michigan" -- this was wrong, since I had 
misremembered the state abbreviation on the envelope. It was Minnesota,
not Michigan. For those who might find the info useful, here's the
address:

Easy Access Dialing
Southwestern Bell Telephone
Caller #8
Burnsville, MN  55337

(Perhaps this firm is handling the access assignment for a number of BOC's?)

I don't know if "caller #8" is the same as "Box #8" or "Drawer #8";
have not seen that address form before.

Regards, Will