Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hao!seismo!rochester!rocksanne!sunybcs!kitty!larry From: larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) Newsgroups: net.auto,net.auto.tech Subject: Re: Laser Pulse Speed Enforcing Message-ID: <877@kitty.UUCP> Date: Sat, 15-Mar-86 10:28:15 EST Article-I.D.: kitty.877 Posted: Sat Mar 15 10:28:15 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 18-Mar-86 23:14:58 EST References: <378@ur-tut.UUCP> <843@kitty.UUCP> <442@utastro.UUCP> <861@kitty.UUCP> <252@noscvax.UUCP> Distribution: na Organization: Recognition Research Corp., Clarence, NY Lines: 22 Xref: dcdwest net.auto:7891 net.auto.tech:946 Summary: Sorry, but it will work... In article <252@noscvax.UUCP>, jordan@noscvax.UUCP (Martin C. Jordan) writes: > I have a question concerning the practical implementation of > an IR/visible laser pulse to speed enforcement. Laser radiation will > either be reflected, absorbed, or backscattered at the surface of the > oncoming vehicle. Unless the vehicle is a MACK truck, the reflected > component will be reflected at some angle AWAY from the direction of > arrival. ... > Any counters to this hypothesis? If not, I shall sleep easier > knowing Buford T. Justice will be denied his cut of the Star Wars' pie. No surface of a motor vehicle will be such a perfect reflector or absorber such that sufficient DETECTABLE modulated IR energy will NOT be returned to the laser device. This statement is based upon the output power/detector sensitivity characteristics of one prototype device which I have seen that has a nominal range of 1,000 meters in clear air. ==> Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp., Clarence, New York <== ==> UUCP {decvax|dual|rocksanne|rocksvax|watmath}!sunybcs!kitty!larry <== ==> VOICE 716/741-9185 {rice|shell}!baylor!/ <== ==> FAX 716/741-9635 {G1, G2, G3 modes} duke!ethos!/ <== ==> seismo!/ <== ==> "Have you hugged your cat today?" ihnp4!/ <==