Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!glacier!kestrel!ladkin
From: ladkin@kestrel.ARPA (Peter Ladkin)
Newsgroups: net.aviation
Subject: Re: Aviation Seminars
Message-ID: <5650@kestrel.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 10-Mar-86 17:54:06 EST
Article-I.D.: kestrel.5650
Posted: Mon Mar 10 17:54:06 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 12-Mar-86 22:31:25 EST
References: <2537@pixar.pixar>
Organization: Kestrel Institute, Palo Alto, CA
Lines: 14

In article <2537@pixar.pixar>, good@pixar writes:
> [referring to the instrument test]
> 	The test itself is a crock.  It is so full of things which are totally
> irrelevant to flying an airplane that I don't feel the least bit guilty for
> having taken a cram course to pass it.

I don't agree. 
It seems to me that the test is very pertinent.
My main concern is that it doesn't go into depth on 
weather interpretations, but expects easy answers.

Do you have examples of what you think is irrelevant?

Peter Ladkin