Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 SMI; site sun.uucp
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!sun!marcum
From: marcum@sun.uucp (Alan Marcum)
Newsgroups: net.aviation
Subject: Re: Regulations questions
Message-ID: <3373@sun.uucp>
Date: Mon, 17-Mar-86 16:23:21 EST
Article-I.D.: sun.3373
Posted: Mon Mar 17 16:23:21 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 19-Mar-86 04:10:50 EST
References: <8603091601.AA07822@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Lines: 17

> What was decided by our group was:
> 	A safety pilot is a cremmember required by the regulations.
> 	and hence when you are acting as safety pilot you log PIC
> 	time.  You are hence not a passenger, you are not second in
> 	command, flying under the hood requires two pilots in command.

According to this interpretation, the co-pilot and the flight engineer
should be loggin PIC time, because the regulations state they are
required crew members.  From my understanding of things, this is not
the case: they log something other than PIC time, beacuse they are NOT
pilot-in-command.  Am I incorrect?

I'd be VERY leary about logging PIC time for safety-pilot time.  Personally,
I log it as SIC time, note who the hooded pilot was.
-- 
Alan M. Marcum				Sun Microsystems, Technical Consulting
...!{dual,ihnp4}!sun!nescorna!marcum	Mountain View, California