Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site batcomputer.TN.CORNELL.EDU Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!tektronix!uw-beaver!bullwinkle!batcomputer!norman From: norman@batcomputer.TN.CORNELL.EDU (Norman Ramsey) Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers,net.books Subject: Re: Spider Robinson's NIGHT OF POWER Message-ID: <410@batcomputer.TN.CORNELL.EDU> Date: Mon, 17-Mar-86 11:03:09 EST Article-I.D.: batcompu.410 Posted: Mon Mar 17 11:03:09 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 22-Mar-86 01:53:52 EST References: <20159@styx.UUCP> Reply-To: norman@batcomputer.UUCP (Norman Ramsey) Distribution: net Organization: Theory Center, Cornell University, Ithaca NY Lines: 24 Xref: watmath net.sf-lovers:12815 net.books:3215 In article <20159@styx.UUCP> mcb@styx.UUCP (Michael C. Berch) writes: >NIGHT OF POWER is a Heinleinian novel, much in the tradition of THE >MOON IS A HARSH MISTRESS or IF THIS GOES ON. It is a novel of ideas >and politics; the characters are *utterly* competent like Heinlein's but >are somehow not as interesting as the usual Robinson cast. (With the exception >of Jennifer, a precocious 13-year old, and her bodyguard and friend, Jose.) >The plot follows the fairly routine path of Ordinary Family Gets Mixed >up in Major Events. (The main characters, parents of the 13-year old, >are of course an interracial couple, which I suppose is the Lowest >Common Denominator of race relations.) Throughout the book, Robinson shows THere are a couple of things I would like to add to this review which I think are worth mentioning. First is that when I read this book it all but screamed I AM A STUDENT OF ROBERT HEINLEIN from every page. I would have enjoyed it more without this. The other is that the book's ending is very weak: MILD SPOILER --- the main character, Jennifer's Dad, suddenly, inexplicably, and unbelievable stops behaving like the well-bred, right-thinking man we all know he is. This goes on for a short time, then suddenly he undergoes another psychological reversal (truth and justice are revealed, or whatever), and the psychological "conflict" is "resolved." I found the whole business very artificial and it badly weakened an otherwise enjoyable book. -- Norman Ramsey norman@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu Pianist at Large