Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!brahms!gsmith From: gsmith@brahms.BERKELEY.EDU (Gene Ward Smith) Newsgroups: net.books Subject: Re: Pale Fire Message-ID: <12563@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Sun, 23-Mar-86 00:30:55 EST Article-I.D.: ucbvax.12563 Posted: Sun Mar 23 00:30:55 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Mar-86 03:22:41 EST References: <12423@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <1814@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: gsmith@brahms.UUCP (Gene Ward Smith) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 35 In article <1814@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> mmar@sphinx.UUCP (Mitchell Marks) writes: >Okay, Darkbloom fans: What do you think, after all, of the *poem* >"Pale Fire" (included in the *novel* _Pale Fire_). Originally the general >reaction was that it was pretty weak, which raised some tasty ironies about >why Kinbote thinks it's good, and how Shade got to be so famous -- just >one oozy step behind Frost. Sometime in the seventies this trend in criticism >turned around, and those commenting on the novel started to treat the poem >as really pretty good in itself -- understood as a comic/ironic epic after >Pope, say. > I think it's fun but still too much doggerel. What say you? I think one of the marvelously clever things about "Pale Fire" is that Shade's poem *is* much more than mere doggerel. It is resolutely anti-modern, of course -- anything written in rhymed couplets would have to be. But it isn't doggerel. It is a poem with touches of Frost, touches of Browning, touches of Pushkin and probably Pope too, I guess. It is conversational and self-revelatory, but the "self" which is revealed is an invention of Nabokov, though at times he serves as a mouthpiece for V.N.'s thoughts. Kinbote's comments are consistently funny, of course. One of the few pieces of actual criticism on the poem is this: How to locate in the blackness, with a gasp, Terra the Fair, an orbicle of jasp. which he calls "The loveliest couplet in this canto." In fact, this would be close to doggerel except that it is ironic. The whole book is full of wonderful multi-leveled irony; very Swiftian. Shade is in earnest about things we laugh over, but is himself ironic. Kinbote's commentary carries this process several steps farther. ucbvax!brahms!gsmith Gene Ward Smith/UCB Math Dept/Berkeley CA 94720 "There are no differences but differences of degree between degrees of difference and no difference"