Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 (USS@Tek, v1.0) based on 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site tekig4.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!hplabs!tektronix!tekig5!tekig4!briand
From: briand@tekig4.UUCP (Brian Diehm)
Newsgroups: net.rec.photo,net.columbia
Subject: Re: What kind of film do the astronauts use?
Message-ID: <529@tekig4.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 10-Mar-86 14:01:28 EST
Article-I.D.: tekig4.529
Posted: Mon Mar 10 14:01:28 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Mar-86 04:29:13 EST
References: <1086@decwrl.DEC.COM> <1972@peora.UUCP> <510@tekig4.UUCP> <2207@utcsri.UUCP> <14789@onfcanim.UUCP> <2003@peora.UUCP>
Reply-To: briand@tekig4Diehm.UUCP (Brian Diehm)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR.
Lines: 17
Xref: watmath net.rec.photo:1904 net.columbia:2633

>> And no, a Hasselblad couldn't be used for moving pictures.
>
>Well, folks, I am a little surprised at this long debate, because when I
>posted the original "what kind of film" question (<1972@peora.UUCP>), I
>*knew* the astronauts didn't film the IMAX movies with a Hasselblad!

Well, I fess up.  I'm the one who misread your original posting and read it to
mean you thought that the Hassleblad was being used for the IMAX movies.  I
don't have your original posting to see what it was that gave me that impres-
sion, but I remember that something made me think you were of that opinion.

My aplogies.  But hasn't it been a lovely discussion?

Ahem.  I'm SO embarassed!  I just can't take me ANYWHERE!

-Brian Diehm
Tektronix, Inc.