Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uiucdcsb Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucdcsb!liberte From: liberte@uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU Newsgroups: net.cse Subject: Re: More on Math and CS Message-ID: <13500006@uiucdcsb> Date: Thu, 13-Mar-86 18:06:00 EST Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.13500006 Posted: Thu Mar 13 18:06:00 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 15-Mar-86 03:32:27 EST References: <147@umcp-cs.UUCP> Lines: 32 Nf-ID: #R:umcp-cs.UUCP:147:uiucdcsb:13500006:000:1426 Nf-From: uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU!liberte Mar 13 17:06:00 1986 Regarding the discussion on Linear Algebra: I did not have to take Linear Algebra for my BS degree in CS, but I did try it while I was a math major. It was fun to write APL algorithms to do the mechanical operations until I told the professor who responded: "Why bother - it's already been done." Then the increasingly abstract treatment drove me from math to compute science. I just discovered a book that might be appeal to some: "Linear Algebra and Geometry" by David Bloom, published by Cambridge University Press. A paragraph from the preface: At this point I asked myself: if linear algebra and geometry can be so well integrated mathematically, why not integrate them pedagogically? Specifically, instead of two one-term courses, why not teach one full-year course in which the relations between linear algebra and geometry could be explored to their fullest extent? Here, it seemed, might lie an opportunity to illustrate the unity of mathematics and to counteract the prevalent tendency toward compartmentalization of knowledge. I would encourage such attempts at integration for, indeed, what good is knowledge if it is not related to other knowledge? Also, I have found from personal experience that the best way to learn something is to actually apply the information in some way so that it becomes personal knowledge. Dan LaLiberte liberte@b.cs.uiuc.edu liberte@uiuc.csnet ihnp4!uiucdcs!liberte