Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site cadovax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cadovax!keithd
From: keithd@cadovax.UUCP (Keith Doyle)
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: US Senate bill on computer-transmitted obscenity
Message-ID: <1022@cadovax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 20-Mar-86 17:07:28 EST
Article-I.D.: cadovax.1022
Posted: Thu Mar 20 17:07:28 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 22-Mar-86 23:42:57 EST
References: <228@bu-cs.UUCP> <279@hadron.UUCP> <32@gilbbs.UUCP> <1157@utcs.uucp>
Reply-To: keithd@cadovax.UUCP (Keith Doyle)
Organization: CONTEL CADO Systems, Torrance, CA
Lines: 18

In article <1157@utcs.uucp> flaps@utcs.UUCP (Alan J Rosenthal) writes:
>In article <32@gilbbs.UUCP> mc68020@gilbbs.UUCP (Tom Keller) writes:
>the full text of this bill, which includes
>>To amend title 18, United States Code, to establish criminal penalties for the
>>   transmission by computer of obscene matter, or by computer or other means,
>>   of matter pertaining to the sexual exploitation of children, and for other
>>   purposes.
>
>       ...Of course,
>my definition of 'obscene matter' is probably entirely different from theirs,

Yes, I consider this proposed bill 'obscene matter'.  Does that mean if the
bill passes, it can't be transmitted via computer?   1/2 :-)

Keith Doyle
#  {ucbvax,ihnp4,decvax}!trwrb!cadovax!keithd
#  cadovax!keithd@ucla-locus.arpa