Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rti-sel.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!mcnc!rti-sel!wfi
From: wfi@rti-sel.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.invest
Subject: Re: A comment on "no-load" mutual funds
Message-ID: <721@rti-sel.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 11-Mar-86 16:56:55 EST
Article-I.D.: rti-sel.721
Posted: Tue Mar 11 16:56:55 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Mar-86 04:26:12 EST
References: <1982@jhunix.UUCP> <317@hsi.UUCP> <9492@ucla-cs.ARPA> <12132@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: wfi@rti-sel.UUCP (William Ingogly)
Organization: Research Triangle Institute, NC
Lines: 12
Summary: 

In article <12132@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> mazlack@ernie.berkeley.edu.UUCP (Lawrence J. Mazlack) writes:

>I own/have owned several different Vanguard funds.  ...
>The only disadvantage that I have experienced is that their service is not
>so great.  But, if your management fees are low, they have to save someplace.

I'm a new investor, and Vanguard is one of the companies I've been
looking into. What is it about their service that isn't so great? What
kind of service from a company like Vanguard would you consider first
rate? I guess I don't understand what 'service' means in this context.

                           -- Cheers, Bill Ingogly