Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site umich.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!mb2c!umich!torek
From: torek@umich.UUCP (Paul V. Torek )
Newsgroups: net.math,net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Tarski's definition of truth
Message-ID: <518@umich.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 16-Mar-86 16:14:30 EST
Article-I.D.: umich.518
Posted: Sun Mar 16 16:14:30 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 17-Mar-86 04:01:44 EST
References: <12411@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: torek@umich.UUCP (Paul V. Torek )
Organization: University of Michigan, EECS Dept., Ann Arbor, MI
Lines: 6
Xref: watmath net.math:2972 net.philosophy:4484
Summary: 

That's about all there is to it, Tom -- Tarski's theory of truth isn't much
of a "theory".  `"Grass is green" is true iff grass is green' about sums it
up.  On Tarski's view, saying `"S" is true' is redundant; one can say the same
thing by saying `S' (where S is a proposition).

--Paul Torek							torek@umich