Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucla-cs.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!ucla-cs!flowers From: flowers@ucla-cs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.med Subject: Re: (antibiotics) legal? Message-ID: <9662@ucla-cs.ARPA> Date: Wed, 5-Mar-86 23:06:45 EST Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.9662 Posted: Wed Mar 5 23:06:45 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 8-Mar-86 05:03:35 EST References: <156@proper.UUCP> <12057@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <915@felix.UUCP> <22@spdcc.UUCP> <1425@osu-eddie.UUCP> Reply-To: flowers@ucla-cs.UUCP (Margot Flowers) Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Lines: 37 Summary: Expires: Sender: Followup-To: Distribution: Keywords: In article <1425@osu-eddie.UUCP> mdf@osu-eddie.UUCP (Mark D. Freeman) writes: >Summary: > >In <22@spdcc.UUCP> dyer@spdcc.UUCP (Steve Dyer) writes: >> ... The decision >> to embark on antibiotic therapy comes from a consideration of >> the condition of the patient, an identification of the organisms >> involved and their susceptibility to the antibiotic, a clinical >> judgement as to whether or not antibiotics would effect the course >> of the condition, and an assessment of the possible side effects >> relative to the seriousness of the patient's condition. > >In the dozens of times that my friends and I have had cause to seek help from >members of the medical profession with infections of various sorts, not one >of these doctors has EVER done or ordered a sensitivity test on a culture of >the little beasties causing the problem. Therefore, we have all spent >between 3 weeks and 3 months playing 'musical antibiotics' with the doctor >until, purely by accident, he/she eventually stumbles upon the correct one >to prescribe. The money spent for the useless drugs and office visits doesn't >bug me half as much as having non-specific urethritis for 3 months, when it >could have been fixed up in 2 weeks. > >Is there some legitimate reason why doctors will not have such a sensitivity >test performed? Most of the doctors I have gone to say that it isn't worth >the time and expense to the patient, but I have NEVER seen a case where the >correct antibiotic was prescribed the first time. Sounds like some problem with the doctors you have gone to. With the exception of ear infections, and an episode in my youth, I have never had antibiotics without first a culture. This is across a number of different medical services (including some in the "third world"). The exception in my youth illustrates the problem: I spent an entire year unable to breath through my nose due to a sinus infection, playing musical antibiotics, and never having a culture. I remember sitting for long periods of time in the office while the Dr. scrutinized the PDR trying to find something else to try.