Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihwpt.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ihwpt!knudsen From: knudsen@ihwpt.UUCP (mike knudsen) Newsgroups: net.micro.6809 Subject: Spontaneous ReBoots of OS9? Message-ID: <775@ihwpt.UUCP> Date: Fri, 21-Mar-86 12:00:36 EST Article-I.D.: ihwpt.775 Posted: Fri Mar 21 12:00:36 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 22-Mar-86 21:57:22 EST Distribution: net Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 49 Under what conditions, if any, should RS CoCo OS9 version 1.1 decide to reboot itself? This often happens to me while writing disk files in either DynaStar or the C pre-processor or Pass 1. Without any printed error message, the system just re-boots! The file being written may be garbage, truncated, or complete, but it is THERE after reboot, meaning it got "closed." I have three theories (notice how OS9 has restored the spirit of scientific research and philosphy to home computing :-] ): (1) Microware's code can detect certain error situations as being so hopeless that the best thing to do is reboot and let the user's STARTUP file restart the application. This makes a lot of sense for unattended operations. But I'm not sure that the disk driver should take such drastic measures. Could it be that OS9 realizes its kernel is corrupted? That would justify a reboot. (2) My memory, 6809, SAM, etc is buggy and takes a wild jump into the boonies, which just happens to end up in the boot code. Amazing how at least three different programs (DynaStar (really Pascal pinterp) and first two phases of C compiler) all happen to hit the right spot. (3) My disk controller, or some other happy hardware, is throwing glitches onto the RESET line. You know you can re-boot Coco OS9 anytime just by hitting the RESET button. Since I sometimes get failed disk writes (truncated files) without a reboot, possibly the reset glitches are sometimes too small to reset the 6809 and reboot, but large enough to wipe out the disk controller chips and abort the writing. I'd like to hear from some heavy hackers who can confirm the existence of deliberate reboot code in OS9, or from someone at Microware (I know you're online) who can honestly deny such things, or best of all, another Coco owner who had the same problem and fixed it. Thanks, mike k PS: I'm using a Hard Drive Specialists controller (for floppies only, despite the name). My troubles seem related to usage of large amounts of RAM, either for data (running Dynastar with 13k) or for program (C.pass1 uses 32k just for code!). Maybe I have some crummy RAM near the middle (around $8000).