Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!gatech!gitpyr!cc100jr From: cc100jr@gitpyr.UUCP (Joel M. Rives) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: Re: Problems and Questions about Disks Message-ID: <1546@gitpyr.UUCP> Date: Sat, 15-Mar-86 13:00:58 EST Article-I.D.: gitpyr.1546 Posted: Sat Mar 15 13:00:58 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 16-Mar-86 08:55:17 EST References: <1123@utcs.UUCP> <41000015@iuvax.UUCP> <1513@gitpyr.UUCP> <233@intelca.UUCP> Reply-To: cc100jr@gitpyr.UUCP (Joel M. Rives) Organization: Office of Computing Services, Georgia Tech Lines: 35 In article <233@intelca.UUCP> cem@intelca.UUCP (Chuck McManis) writes: >> I have been experiencing a high fail rate with the OPUS disks that I have >> been using. Has anyone else had a similar experience? I am beginning to >> wonder if my disk drive is not at fault. Out of 20 disks, 6 have read/write >> errors (checksum errors) on them. >> >> > >* * * * Warning * * * * > >In the Bay area (S.F. that is) I have noticed quite a few people who are >using single sided disks on their Amiga. This is sort of a carry over from >the fact that most single sided 5-1/4 inch disks can be used as double >sided. This is *not* the case with 3-1/2" disks. I don't know if it is >disks are rated that way for good reason. Many people regret attempting >to high density floppies which are $2-$3 also per disk. > >--Chuck >-- > - - - D I S C L A I M E R - - - >{ihnp4,fortune}!dual\ All opinions expressed herein are my > {qantel,idi}-> !intelca!cem own and not those of my employer, my > {ucbvax,hao}!hplabs/ friends, or my avocado plant. :-} I can not speak for the others who have complained on this net about OPUS disks. However, the OPUS disks I have been using (with failing results) are double-sided and lifetime warrantied. Joel Rives Georgia Insitute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332 ...!{akgua,allegra,amd,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo,ut-ngp}!gatech!gitpyr!cc100jr "Remember, no matter where you go, there you are!" << Buckaroo Banzai >>