Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ho95e.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!ho95e!wcs
From: wcs@ho95e.UUCP (x0705)
Newsgroups: net.micro,net.micro.pc,net.micro.mac,net.micro.68k,net.lang,net.lang.lisp,net.sources,net.micro.hp,net.news.group
Subject: Re: XLISP
Message-ID: <574@ho95e.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 22-Mar-86 14:37:49 EST
Article-I.D.: ho95e.574
Posted: Sat Mar 22 14:37:49 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 24-Mar-86 00:31:37 EST
References: <507@spice.cs.cmu.edu> <1209@ulysses.UUCP> <123@eed092.UUCP>
Reply-To: wcs@ho95e.UUCP (Bill Stewart 1-201-949-0705 ihnp4!ho95c!wcs HO 2G202)
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 5
Xref: watmath net.micro:14099 net.micro.pc:7506 net.micro.mac:5224 net.micro.68k:1584 net.lang:2252 net.lang.lisp:751 net.sources:4629 net.micro.hp:175 net.news.group:5279
Summary: why not use net.lang.lisp?

>> > I am planning to start an INFO-XLISP mailing list.  The reasons for this are:
Why not use net.lang.lisp?  Traffic is fairly low, and the topis seems
appropriate.
-- 
# Bill Stewart, AT&T Bell Labs 2G-202, Holmdel NJ 1-201-949-0705 ihnp4!ho95c!wcs