Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 (USS@Tek, v1.0) based on 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site tekcbi.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!pesnta!hplabs!tektronix!tekcbi!kathl
From: kathl@tekcbi.UUCP (Kathleen Wilkman)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: The Woodman
Message-ID: <537@tekcbi.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 7-Mar-86 17:08:46 EST
Article-I.D.: tekcbi.537
Posted: Fri Mar  7 17:08:46 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Mar-86 14:46:38 EST
References: <587@dadla.UUCP>
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR
Lines: 16
Keywords: Woody Allen

In article <587@dadla.UUCP>, dand@dadla.UUCP (Dan Davis) writes:
> Why do Woody Allen's movies -Play It Again, Sam- and -A Midsummers
> Night Sex Comedy- get such zero press. When the critics fawn over
> -Annie Hall- etc. as his best, the two others are almost totally
> ignored. To my mind, they are two of his best, if not THE best. 
> -Hannah And Her Sisters- is surely a wonderful movie, but
> -...Sam- and -...Comedy- are classics.
> 
> Any opinions one way or the other??? Or is it just me???

I agree with you that _Play it Again Sam_ has never gotten the press
that it deserves.  It is Woody at his best.  I felt that _A Midsummers
Night Sex Comedy_ was a bit forced in places.

I look forward to seeing _Hannah And Her Sisters_.  I've heard only
good about it.