Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site psivax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!hplabs!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: F/X (Spoilers...)
Message-ID: <1073@psivax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 19-Mar-86 15:34:33 EST
Article-I.D.: psivax.1073
Posted: Wed Mar 19 15:34:33 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 22-Mar-86 06:47:37 EST
References: <1721@mtgzz.UUCP> <449@ethos.UUCP> <161@rtech.UUCP>
Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Distribution: na
Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA
Lines: 15

In article <161@rtech.UUCP> daveb@rtech.UUCP (Dave Brower) writes:
>No, I was not dissapointed by the ending.  It was refreshing *not* to
>have another depressing denouement.  Now, I DID have to get in a fairly
>accepting mood for the beginning and the middle...
>
	I am glad to hear this, now I can go watch the movie without
worrying about it keeping me awake afterwards. The large probability
of a depressing denouement is the main reason that I do not watch many
thrillers or suspense films.
-- 

				Sarima (Stanley Friesen)

UUCP: {ttidca|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|quad1|nrcvax|bellcore|logico}!psivax!friesen
ARPA: ttidca!psivax!friesen@rand-unix.arpa