Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site sjuvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!psuvax1!burdvax!bpa!sjuvax!kirsch From: kirsch@sjuvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.music,net.music.synth Subject: Re: Digital Reverb? Message-ID: <2934@sjuvax.UUCP> Date: Fri, 21-Mar-86 13:22:42 EST Article-I.D.: sjuvax.2934 Posted: Fri Mar 21 13:22:42 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 24-Mar-86 00:41:05 EST References: <3095@potomac.UUCP> <2913@sjuvax.UUCP> <2920@sjuvax.UUCP> Reply-To: kirsch@sjuvax.UUCP (P. Kirsch) Organization: St. Joseph's University, Phila. PA. Lines: 37 Xref: watmath net.music:12782 net.music.synth:956 In article <2920@sjuvax.UUCP> lp102918@sjuvax.UUCP (Larry Palena) writes: > > ...I know this is gonna sound like a stupid question,but hey!!!, > stupidity is a virtue.What is *digital* about digital delays?? > Do they sample the delayed signal,or use microprocessors > to control feedback,or both??... > > ...also,why has mechanical (ie. spring-controlled) reverb died?? > Was it particularly prone to failure? I have a Fender-Twin (circa. > '69) with mechanical that doesn't work,but when it did I thought > it was *fantastic*,super-genuine!!... > > Larry Palena > > PS- ...and what exactly *was* the story behind net.music.guitar?? > Larry, I think the big advantage to the digital reverb is the cleaner sound. Some people don't like the extra bit of treble/tinniness that you get from the spring reverb. I guess it's the same as all other analog vs. digital arguments--with the digital you can get a cleaner sound--which really gets some people off-though others still like the analog sound. -- "Honesty Ain't All that Hard, Just Put Rambo Back Inside your Pants" -Jello Biafra Paul Kirsch St. Joseph's University Philadelphia, Pa { astrovax | allegra | bpa | burdvax } !sjuvax!kirsch