Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site hoptoad.uucp
Path: utzoo!lsuc!pesnta!pyramid!decwrl!sun!hoptoad!laura
From: laura@hoptoad.uucp (Laura Creighton)
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: "new group..."
Message-ID: <598@hoptoad.uucp>
Date: Sun, 9-Mar-86 12:28:35 EST
Article-I.D.: hoptoad.598
Posted: Sun Mar  9 12:28:35 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 10-Mar-86 02:05:43 EST
References: <417@excalibur.UUCP> <838@decuac.UUCP>
Reply-To: laura@hoptoad.UUCP (Laura Creighton)
Distribution: net
Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco
Lines: 16
Xref: lsuc net.news.group:2487 net.sf-lovers:6231

In article <838@decuac.UUCP> avolio@decuac.UUCP (Frederick M. Avolio) writes:
>In article <417@excalibur.UUCP>, sword02@excalibur.UUCP writes:
>> ... a proposal for a new group!  At the moment there is only one NET.BOOKS.
>> I would like ... a NET.BOOKS for just fantasy, and science fiction lovers.
>
>net.sf-lovers is more than 50% dicussions of f&sf books.  There is no need
>for another group.

I don't know, Fred.  I am not interested in the other 50%, which is why
I don't subscribe to net/sf-lovers.  If there are a lot of people in
my position, then net.books.sf would be a good idea.  I don't think
that I am a minority of one -- but perhaps I am
-- 
Laura Creighton		
ihnp4!hoptoad!laura  utzoo!hoptoad!laura  sun!hoptoad!laura
toad@lll-crg.arpa