Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hao.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!hplabs!hao!woods
From: woods@hao.UUCP (Greg Woods)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: New newsgroup proceedures, voting..
Message-ID: <1988@hao.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 10-Mar-86 14:31:33 EST
Article-I.D.: hao.1988
Posted: Mon Mar 10 14:31:33 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 12-Mar-86 06:07:37 EST
References: <5075@alice.uUCp> <3326@sun.uucp> <1984@hao.UUCP> <31@comp.lancs.ac.uk>
Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 17

> In article <1984@hao.UUCP> woods@hao.UUCP writes:
> > o Rather than one vote per site, make it one vote per feed, with votes being
> > 	made by the SA. This gives the sites that are funding the net, the
> > 	backbones, the added priviledge of helping to decide where the money
> > 	they are spending on this thing is used.

  I know this is nitpicky, but I did not write that. Once again I would like
to ask people who are using software that automatically includes parts of
articles to check that they are not attributing text which was merely quoted
in a subsequent article to the wrong author. This is very annoying. In a 
critical case you could even be sued for libel by attributing to someone 
comments which they did not make. In this case, I *quoted* that text in my 
article. The original was, I believe (take that as a disclaimer) written by 
Greg Skinner. (Note that here I do not state that as though it were a fact,
contrary to the above quote from "my" article).

--Greg