Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!linus!philabs!cmcl2!lanl!jlg
From: jlg@lanl.ARPA (Jim Giles)
Newsgroups: net.philosophy,net.sci
Subject: Re: Contempt prior to Investigation
Message-ID: <386@lanl.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 12-Mar-86 19:37:08 EST
Article-I.D.: lanl.386
Posted: Wed Mar 12 19:37:08 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 15-Mar-86 20:39:13 EST
References: <435@ccivax.UUCP> <13400007@uiucdcsp> <12239@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <494@utastro.UUCP> <362@unirot.UUCP>
Reply-To: jlg@a.UUCP (Jim Giles)
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 19
Xref: watmath net.philosophy:4451 net.sci:589

In article <362@unirot.UUCP> cjr@unirot.UUCP (Charles Riordan) writes:
>Speaking of which, while you guys are de-luding yourselves with your
>dogmatic Western science, I think I'll be re-luding myself, if you know
>what I mean. Pete and my other friend Bobby are coming over to watch
>the tape of the Dead's New Year's show on my new VCR, and the only way
>I can cope with both the incredible deepness of the Dead and the heavy
>trips Pete lays on me is to get my brain a little loosened up to free
>my Eastern mind from the bonds of my Western mind's dogmatic thinking.
>Heavy stuff, man.

I wonder if friend Pete could have built a VCR with all his 'in depth'
knowledge of the 'truth'.  Certainly no eastern religeon that I'm aware of
would have been able to understand the real world well enough to contruct
computer networks, and I wouldn't be stuck listening to all these
groundless claims.  Hmm...maybe you're right after all, if science hadn't
been so successful, I wouldn't have to hear from you.

J. Giles
Los Alamos