Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site valid.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!akguc!codas!peora!pesnta!valid!pete
From: pete@valid.UUCP (Pete Zakel)
Newsgroups: net.origins,net.physics
Subject: Re: Bogus Physics
Message-ID: <176@valid.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 7-Mar-86 15:59:11 EST
Article-I.D.: valid.176
Posted: Fri Mar  7 15:59:11 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 10-Mar-86 00:22:16 EST
References: <2057@jhunix.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Valid Logic, San Jose, CA
Lines: 12
Xref: watmath net.origins:2932 net.physics:3914

> a note to Mr. Dahlke:  name calling begins at home.  Refering to Lorentz
> transformations as "Lawrence transformations" shows that your knowledge
> in this field is also "bogus".
> 
>                         - David Fry

So he didn't remember how to spell "Lorentz".  That makes his knowledge bogus?
I know many programmers that can't spell or construct grammatical sentences.
They are still quite good programmers.  How does lack of spelling knowledge
relate to physics knowledge?
-- 
-Pete Zakel (..!{hplabs,amd,pyramid,ihnp4}!pesnta!valid!pete)