Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihuxn.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ihuxn!gadfly
From: gadfly@ihuxn.UUCP (Gadfly)
Newsgroups: net.origins,net.physics
Subject: Re: Bogus Physics
Message-ID: <1372@ihuxn.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 13-Mar-86 11:56:51 EST
Article-I.D.: ihuxn.1372
Posted: Thu Mar 13 11:56:51 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Mar-86 07:10:19 EST
References: <2057@jhunix.UUCP> <176@valid.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 25
Xref: watmath net.origins:2942 net.physics:3927

--
> a note to Mr. Dahlke:  name calling begins at home.  Refering to Lorentz
> transformations as "Lawrence transformations" shows that your knowledge
> in this field is also "bogus".
> 
>                         - David Fry

The hell it does.  Think, Mr. Fry.  Scientifically, even.  By what
plausible hypothesis could a person know his subject matter cold but
make the blatant (hint: but homonymic) spelling error above?  After
all, we've all seen Lorentz's name in the literature so often...

...Or have we?  Well, I won't keep you in suspense any longer, Dave.
Mr. Dahlke, whom I know personally, is totally blind.  If I were
you, Dave, I'd feel mighty small right now, but who knows, it might
just be a (no, stop Ken, don't inflict this pun on the world--you
promised to use your skill only for good, never for evil--no, please!)
Lorentz contraction.
-- 
                    *** ***
JE MAINTIENDRAI   ***** *****
                 ****** ******  13 Mar 86 [23 Ventose An CXCIV]
ken perlow       *****   *****
(312)979-7753     ** ** ** **
..ihnp4!iwsl8!ken   *** ***