Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site felix.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!hplabs!felix!daver
From: daver@felix.UUCP (Dave Richards)
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: Re: Bogus Physics
Message-ID: <955@felix.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 12-Mar-86 16:23:23 EST
Article-I.D.: felix.955
Posted: Wed Mar 12 16:23:23 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Mar-86 08:23:26 EST
References: <2057@jhunix.UUCP> <176@valid.UUCP> <598@kontron.UUCP>
Reply-To: daver@felix.UUCP (Dave Richards)
Distribution: net
Organization: FileNet Corp., Costa Mesa, CA
Lines: 16

>Misspelling "Lorentz" as "Lorintz", or "Larentz" would suggest that Mr.
>Dahlke has at least read something about "Lorentz transformations" but
>couldn't remember the spelling.  Turning it into "Lawrence" suggests he
>hasn't ever read anything on the subject -- just relying on what he heard
>on the radio or at a party.

So as I understand it, knowledge that I acquire by word of mouth, ie.:  
the radio, friends, a lecture by a professor; these sources are all
"bogus".  So all the stuff that's important is printed, like in books,
magazines; like National Enquirer, etc.

Aside from that, you are still making a conclusion about the poster of the
article which may or may not have any validity.  In fact, it sounds remark- 
ably like a put-down.

Dave "Holler when you're hit!" Richards