Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!mcnc!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!think!mit-eddie!mit-vax!oaf From: oaf@mit-vax.UUCP (Oded Feingold) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: What's So Unthinkable About Slave Labor?? Message-ID: <380@mit-vax.UUCP> Date: Thu, 6-Mar-86 15:18:30 EST Article-I.D.: mit-vax.380 Posted: Thu Mar 6 15:18:30 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 9-Mar-86 21:21:30 EST Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA Lines: 69 >> [Ron Rizzo referring to my mention that zek labor built the >> Soviet end of the Siberian-European gas pipeline. ------------------------------ > I have this nasty feeling as I read this that you must be joking, >and I have missed all of the :-). If this was a joke and I missed the >point feel free to flame at me for my stupidity... [David desJardins] > No evidence here, just unsupported speculation by ardent anti-Soviets. ------------------------------ In this case including Andrei Sakharov. Does he have a history of lying, or showing disrespect for the truth? > And we all know that if those nasty Communists say one thing the >opposite must be true... ------------------------------ A telling point. >> In "The First Guidebook to U.S.S.R. Prisons and Concentration >> Camps," Avraham Shifrin superimposed the pipeline route with >> wonderful precision on a map of the camps. [ 141 ] > So at last we have the evidence. Did he happen by any chance to >superimpose either of these with railroad maps? I'll bet they match >with "wonderful precision." Or does the fact that the camps are near >the rail lines mean that the prisoners were forced to build those too? :-) ------------------------------ It doesn't MEAN it. But isn't it likely anyway? I am mystified that Mr. desJardins belittles the topic with cute debater's tricks. Does he seriously doubt the allegations? Must they be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt" in a court of law? Evidence ranging from Solzhenitsyn's works, to reports by Amnesty International and other human-rights organizations, to stratments of ex-prisoners, to Soviet military SIOPs (which include punishment battalions of zeks qto be forced into battle, with KGB forces riding herd on them) support systematic Soviet use of slave labor on various projects, including major items of national development. Is this one somehow magically different? Why such sneering superiority? If you debate Ron Rizzo, do you need to prove he's screwed up on every point, truth be damned? Must you stake your ego (and argument) on a reversal of longstanding Soviet domestic policy? It seems natural to believe the USSR uses slave labor wherever it can, including on the pipeline. It's a side issue from the viewpoint of arms control, but not when we model ideal societies. I don't feel a need to "prove" such specifics to people emotionally involved with believing the opposite. Patterns of behavior and close precedents suffice. That's not ideological - there are nations and regimes with recent histories of cruel behavior, left and right. That's no great revelation. (Admittedly, if someone accused the Swedish government of deliberate brutality as national policy, I'd want to see extensive evidence, since it flies in the face of all other information about that country. But is it difficult to believe nasty things happen routinely in South Africa, Paraguay, even the USSR? If you were told that Indonesian troops slaughter Timorese, would it amaze you? Would you require proof before giving the report any credence?) I suspect you wrote your message merely to make Ron Rizzo feel like shit. If that's important to you, go right ahead, little boy. But don't call it debating - merely baiting. -- ---------- Oded Feingold MIT AI Lab. 545 Tech Square Cambridge, Mass. 02139 OAF%OZ@MIT-MC.ARPA {harvard, ihnp4!mit-eddie}!mit-vax!oaf 617-253-8598