Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site decwrl.DEC.COM Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-bartok!mahoney From: mahoney@bartok.DEC Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Re: Reagan evil?: re to jj Message-ID: <1623@decwrl.DEC.COM> Date: Tue, 11-Mar-86 15:16:17 EST Article-I.D.: decwrl.1623 Posted: Tue Mar 11 15:16:17 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 15-Mar-86 06:18:58 EST Sender: daemon@decwrl.DEC.COM Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 45 ---------------------Reply to mail dated 7-MAR-1986 19:37--------------------- I am sick of reading about Ronald Reagan being a pathological liar. He is not a pathological liar. I do not support Ronald Reagan (I voted for Mondale) or his programs. He is above all a politician and a calculating one at that. The lies or mistruths that he tells are probably those that the most Presidents would tell unfortunately. Let us look how Lyndon Johnson got Goldwater branded a hawk. *The Goldwater story for those who don't know* Senator Goldwater was asked about what he would do in Vietnam. Goldwater said that if you are going to fight the war fight to win. If it is neccessary to use the bomb then use it. If you are not going to fight to win then we should get out of the Vietnam altogether and forget about it. Lyndon and company left the last part out when ever they talked about this. Thus they made it look as though Goldwater was a hawk and they were peaceniks. Now we all remember what dear President Johnson did in Vietnam. * end of Goldwater story. Does this make Johnson a pathalogical liar or a cold calculating individual. I tend towards the cold calculating individual. How about how Kennedy talked about the Diems and other fun persons in Vietnam. Richard Nixon and how he kept telling people that he was getting our boys home and kept escalating the war. I purpose the problem is not so much with Reagan as with the type of person we as Americans elect. This not meant as an attack on Americans more as an attack on human nature. Humans tend not to like to hear the truth if it is bad so if someone tells them something nice well it makes them feel better. So politicians tend to tell people not lies but bent truths so it will make things more palitiable and in that way they stay elected. (The problem politicians run into is the press who tend to unbend these truths and thus they look bad.) It is this cycle they get into that is very hard to get out of and thus they can go overboard. As an end I do not condone this and this is obviously not true for all politicians. Most people have told some short of lie in their life so as not to hurt someone this is an expansion of that. I personally think it is wrong but only the American people can do something about. (fortunately they can) Brian Mahoney