Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!glacier!oliveb!hplabs!qantel!lll-lcc!lll-crg!seismo!rochester!rocksanne!sunybcs!ellie!colonel
From: colonel@ellie.UUCP (Col. G. L. Sicherman)
Newsgroups: net.rec.nude
Subject: Re: Nudist life style
Message-ID: <887@ellie.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 13-Mar-86 13:44:56 EST
Article-I.D.: ellie.887
Posted: Thu Mar 13 13:44:56 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 18-Mar-86 01:18:59 EST
References: <83200002@siemens.UUCP> <1819@hammer.UUCP> <683@frog.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: A-1 Mosquito Farms
Lines: 21
Keywords: children, eating in front of

In article <683@frog.UUCP>, wjr@frog.UUCP (STella Calvert) writes:
 
> OK, so riddle me this -- why is eating (another enjoyable biofunction)
> not only not private, but downright social?
> 
> I think the "sex is private" argument begs an important question -- if
> it's not "dirty", why is it necessarily more private than other
> activities?  You mean you let your kids watch you EAT?
> 
> I really didn't think anything could shock me, but I guess I was
> wrong.  Eating in front of _children_?

The _Worm Runner's Digest_ once printed an article called "Nice
People Don't Eat"--a straightforward extrapolation.  I think it
appeared in the WRD anthology _A Stress Analysis of a Strapless
Evening Gown._
-- 
Col. G. L. Sicherman
UU: ...{rocksvax|decvax}!sunybcs!colonel
CS: colonel@buffalo-cs
BI: csdsicher@sunyabva