Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Denver Mods 7/26/84) 6/24/83; site drutx.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!drutx!slb From: slb@drutx.UUCP (Sue Brezden) Newsgroups: net.sci Subject: Re: Contempt prior to investigation (pyramids) Message-ID: <324@drutx.UUCP> Date: Mon, 17-Mar-86 12:28:41 EST Article-I.D.: drutx.324 Posted: Mon Mar 17 12:28:41 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 19-Mar-86 00:42:35 EST Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver Lines: 34 >>>The Egyptian "merchants code". >> >>You'll have to explain this. > >In the "Valley of the Kings" clay tablets containing cuniform tablets >seem to describe orders for building materials, and procedures for >building the pyramids which seem to contradict the "stones on rollers" >theory. Floatation is described, and water floatation was possible >in the valley, but it is also described in an area where there is >little water. No mystery there. There are yearly floods in Egypt, remember? Work on the pyramids was done during the flood months, since the labor was available (no farming can be done then.) The building materials were floated to the base of the site, then rollers and ramps were used from there. They weren't stupid--that's the easiest way to do it. The pyramid sites, by the way, were selected to be just barely out of the flood area--close enough to float the stones. (The Egyptians didn't build many temples, pyramids, tombs, etc. in the area that was flooded, since that would take away ariable land--a very rare commodity there.) That's been known for quite a while. Maybe you need to read some real sources on Egyptology? (I won't comment on the "cuniform" statement. Sigh.) -- Sue Brezden ihnp4!drutx!slb ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nirvana? That's a place where the powers that be and their friends hang out. --Zonker Harris ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~