Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!brahms!weemba
From: weemba@brahms.BERKELEY.EDU (Matthew P. Wiener)
Newsgroups: net.sci,net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Value of therapy
Message-ID: <12522@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Fri, 21-Mar-86 06:01:42 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.12522
Posted: Fri Mar 21 06:01:42 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 22-Mar-86 22:37:54 EST
References: <899@decwrl.DEC.COM> <402@aoa.UUCP> <192@ulowell.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: weemba@brahms.UUCP (Matthew P. Wiener)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 11
Xref: watmath net.sci:626 net.philosophy:4577

In article <421@aoa.UUCP> carl@aoa.UUCP (Carl Witthoft) writes:
>[discussion of the viability of psychotherapy deleted]

>If you really think that *65% spontaneous remission* occurs, go look at
>the bag ladies in any city.

What exactly is this sentence doing in your article?  At best it is giving
a circular appeal to your argument.  At worst it is giving a circular appeal
to your argument.

ucbvax!brahms!weemba	Matthew P Wiener/UCB Math Dept/Berkeley CA 94720