Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!pesnta!hplabs!qantel!lll-lcc!lll-crg!seismo!rochester!bullwinkle!uw-beaver!uw-june!uw-vlsi!li
From: li@uw-vlsi.ARPA (Phyllis Li)
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: "new group..."
Message-ID: <215@uw-vlsi.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 5-Mar-86 17:55:46 EST
Article-I.D.: uw-vlsi.215
Posted: Wed Mar  5 17:55:46 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Mar-86 14:45:01 EST
References: <417@excalibur.UUCP> <838@decuac.UUCP>
Reply-To: li@uw-vlsi.UUCP
Distribution: net
Organization: UW/NW VLSI Consortium, Seattle
Lines: 21
Keywords: new-group, fantasy
Xref: lsuc net.news.group:2482 net.sf-lovers:6206
Summary: Maybe more fantasy on sf-lovers, instead of new group.

In article <838@decuac.UUCP> avolio@decuac.UUCP (Frederick M. Avolio) writes:
>In article <417@excalibur.UUCP>, sword02@excalibur.UUCP writes:
>> ... a proposal for a new group!  At the moment there is only one NET.BOOKS.
>> I would like ... a NET.BOOKS for just fantasy, and science fiction lovers.
>
>net.sf-lovers is more than 50% dicussions of f&sf books.  There is no need
>for another group.

Actually I don't see all that much fantasy begin discussed here; and when
it is it is usually done in a "well, I shouldn't, but..." manner.  Here's
to more fantasy on sf-lovers!!  :)

					LiralenOx Li



-- 
A closed mouth gathers no foot.

USENET:  ihnp4!akgua!sb6!fluke!uw-vlsi!li
ARPA:    li@uw-vlsi.arpa